|
Q & A
Question Sorting on
Total Questions922
A private company has husband and wife as only two directors as well as shareholders. There is no other shareholder. Husband is co
Read More
A private company has husband and wife as only two directors as well as shareholders. There is no other shareholder. Husband is continuing as a whole time director since 1996 as there was no fixed tenure in his appointment letter. The questions now are :1. Does the Company need to reappoint him with a tenure of 5 years now ? If yes, can he be reappointed now say. in December, 2014 or January, 2015 ? 2. Whether in respect of the Board resolution for his reappointment and remuneration, Section 184 and Section 188 apply ? 3. Will he compulsorily be treated as a KMP ? 4. Whether MR 1 in this case will be filed within 60 days from Board resolution or from General meeting resolution ( as the general meeting will now only be in September, 2015) ?
- Views (2160)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1318)
-
- Posted By: Nava bharat ventures limited 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1068)
-
- Posted By: Atul 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (862)
-
- Posted By: Latha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1005)
-
- Posted By: Khushboo 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1418)
-
- Posted By: Mookambika r 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (872)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (806)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (782)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1433)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1326)
-
- Posted By: Nilesh patel 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (991)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 8 year(s) ago
|
I LEFT A COMPANY IN THE MONTH OF APRIL 2008 AND AT PRESENT I AM WORKING AS A PRACTICING COMPANY SECRETARY. THE COMPANY HAS NOT FIL
Read More
I LEFT A COMPANY IN THE MONTH OF APRIL 2008 AND AT PRESENT I AM WORKING AS A PRACTICING COMPANY SECRETARY. THE COMPANY HAS NOT FILED FORM 32 OF MY CESSATION AND MY NAME IS APPEARING IN THE LIST OF SIGNATORIES ON MCA MASTER DATA. THE COMPANY HAS NOT FILED ANNUAL RETURN FROM THE YEAR 2007 TO 2015. ROC HAS LAUNCHED A PROSECUTION IN THE COURT AND I HAVE ALSO BEEN ARRAYED AS AN ACCUSED. NOW, PLEASE ADVISE ON FOLLOWING- 1. HOW MY NAME WILL BE REMOVED FROM MCA MASTER DATA AS I AM IN PRACTICE AND FORM 32/DIR-12 CAN NOT BE FILED. 2. HOW CAN I DEFEND MYSELF IN THE COURT.
- Views (886)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1049)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1038)
-
- Posted By: Madhu 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1243)
-
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1110)
-
- Posted By: Rachna gupta singh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1061)
-
- Posted By: Ketan antani 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (929)
-
- Posted By: Ketan antani 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (778)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1362)
-
- Posted By: Vandana bhatia 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (908)
-
- Posted By: Hardam singh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1076)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1207)
-
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1769)
-
- Posted By: Shairill a. dubey 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1021)
-
- Posted By: Naresh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1305)
-
- Posted By: Gopika m n 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (638)
-
- Posted By: Gurpreet kaur 6 year(s) ago
|
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one offi
Read More
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one office of the Company as CEO who is not a Director of the Company. Kindly clarify the following :-
01. Will he term and considered as KMP in term of Provision of Section 2(51) of the Act ?
02. Will he termed and considered as officer in default in terms of Provision of section 2(60) of the Act ?
03. Whether the Company require to File Form DIR-12 in respect of his appointment as CEO ?
04. Is it mandatory to disclose details of appointment of such CEO in Board’s Report in terms of section 134 (3)(q) read with sub-rule 5 of rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2015 ?
04. Is it mandatory to sign Financial Statements by him in terms of section 134(1) of the Act ?
- Views (689)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 5 year(s) ago
|
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one offi
Read More
One Private Limited Company have appointed “Voluntarily” (Not Mandatorily as required in terms of Section 203 of the Act) one office of the Company as CEO who is not a Director of the Company. Kindly clarify the following :-
01. Will he term and considered as KMP in term of Provision of Section 2(51) of the Act ?
02. Will he termed and considered as officer in default in terms of Provision of section 2(60) of the Act ?
03. Whether the Company require to File Form DIR-12 in respect of his appointment as CEO ?
04. Is it mandatory to disclose details of appointment of such CEO in Board’s Report in terms of section 134 (3)(q) read with sub-rule 5 of rule 8 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2015 ?
04. Is it mandatory to sign Financial Statements by him in terms of section 134(1) of the Act ?
- Views (693)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 5 year(s) ago
|
- Views (791)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (832)
-
- Posted By: Ketan antani 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (919)
-
- Posted By: Nitin 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (793)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (988)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 9 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1605)
-
- Posted By: Genicon 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2851)
-
- Posted By: Zaeem 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1885)
-
- Posted By: Palani kumar b 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2923)
-
- Posted By: Pramod prabhudesai 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (10216)
-
- Posted By: Genicon 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3339)
-
- Posted By: Mukund govindharajan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1494)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1216)
-
- Posted By: Sahil 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1472)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1524)
-
- Posted By: Deepti vohra 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1095)
-
- Posted By: Kishore p shah 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1150)
-
- Posted By: Abhinaya 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1869)
-
- Posted By: V. subramanian 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1828)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1491)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
The Companies Act 2013, provides for voting by electronic means by shareholders at general meeting - Section 108. Draft Rules 7.18
Read More
The Companies Act 2013, provides for voting by electronic means by shareholders at general meeting - Section 108. Draft Rules 7.18 1 specifies that listed companies and companies with more than 500 shareholders may provide for electronic voting for section 108. Under Companies Act 1956, the Circular 72/2011 dt 27.12.2011 under Green Initiative provides it is optional for companies to provide for share holders participation at general meetings through video conferencing. There is no such mention of participation of shareholders through video conferencing at general meetings in the Companies Act 2013 and draft rules. Does that mean that the option of video conferencing facility for share holders participation in general meetings is dropped under Companies Act 2013.Hence can it be concluded that under Companies Act 2013 even as an option the company can no more provide video conferencing facility to share holders for participation in General Meetings. [by. G Mukund]
- Views (6781)
-
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1295)
-
- Posted By: Priyadarshini 10 year(s) ago
|
Dear Sir/ Madam, Ref: Section 186 and Explanation to Rule no 13 (1) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 20
Read More
Dear Sir/ Madam, Ref: Section 186 and Explanation to Rule no 13 (1) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014) According to me, we can investment, give loan etc ....exceeding limits ...........but we have to pass special resolution with in 1 year from the notification of these rules. It means if limits are 10 Cr .....my current borrowing is 12 cr.....I can further borrow to say 20 cr ( with out passing special resolution immediately).... but have to take approval for the same by 31.03.2015. Kindly provided your inputs. Thanks, Mandar
- Views (1533)
-
- Posted By: Mandar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1079)
-
- Posted By: Arpita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1366)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
Sir Please advise me: Query 1: A Pvt ltd is to be converted in to LLP. Whether Board Resolution by the Pvt ltd co. is sufficient
Read More
Sir Please advise me: Query 1: A Pvt ltd is to be converted in to LLP. Whether Board Resolution by the Pvt ltd co. is sufficient for Conversion in to LLP or Extraordinary general meeting is further required to be conducted for the conversion? Query 2: E-form 18 under LLP act requires to obtain the Consent from Shareholders of the pvt ltd for conversion. Whether Simple consent by Shareholders by way of letter is sufficient or calling EGM is needed? Query 3: Whether MGT- 14 form is needed to be filed in both the above mentioned queries ? Thanking You With Regards
- Views (1208)
-
- Posted By: Kamal 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1748)
-
- Posted By: Anjali 11 year(s) ago
|
A Company is required to spend say Rs.10 on CSR in the FY 2014-15. The amount of Rs.10 is based on 2 of average PBT of the FY 2011
Read More
A Company is required to spend say Rs.10 on CSR in the FY 2014-15. The amount of Rs.10 is based on 2 of average PBT of the FY 2011:12, 2012:13 and 2013:14. In the FY 2014:15, the Company actually spent Rs.5 on the CSR projects identified by it and Rs.3 will be spent on the same projects in the next FY, leaving Rs.2 not to be spent by it. The Board also gives reasons for not spending Rs.2 to its shareholders. With this background, my Question is –How Companies will record the amount under CSR Pool, as it is not in the nature of “Reserve”, which can be brought back to Profit. In the given case, where the amount i.e. Rs.2 not spent will go. As per the Draft CSR Rules, surplus arising out of the CSR activity will not be part of business profits of the company. | By. DS Mahajan
- Views (1759)
-
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1550)
-
- Posted By: Chandra 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1776)
-
- Posted By: V.b. mahajan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2664)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay dewan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1767)
-
- Posted By: Pradeep panda 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1724)
-
- Posted By: Mukund govindharajan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1460)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1656)
-
- Posted By: Pooja hiranandani 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1523)
-
- Posted By: Pawan 9 year(s) ago
|
Rule 2f of the CSR Rules, 2014 provides meaning of the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in accordan
Read More
Rule 2f of the CSR Rules, 2014 provides meaning of the net profit of a company as per its financial statement prepared in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Act, but shall not include the following, namely:—
ii any dividend received from other companies in India, which are covered under and complying with the provisions of section 135 of the Act:
Here I wish to know that any dividend received would be deducted from profit before tax or dividend is to be deducted of only those declaring cos which are covered under Section 135 of the Act. If yes to second option, whether disclosure of reason in Directors Report of not complying CSR liability shall be considered as compliance for the purpose of these rules.
- Views (1107)
-
- Posted By: Rakesh jain 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1406)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay solanki 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1281)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1605)
-
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1312)
-
- Posted By: Dharmesh dixit 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1462)
-
- Posted By: Manoj kumar singh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1892)
-
- Posted By: Hardam singh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1335)
-
- Posted By: Ramnik bhimani 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1718)
-
- Posted By: Kamlesh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1350)
-
- Posted By: Lalitha kannan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1191)
-
- Posted By: Gagandeep singh 10 year(s) ago
|
Based on MCA circular 8/2014 and CSR rules, the CSR reporting in the directors report will not be applicable to a Company which ha
Read More
Based on MCA circular 8/2014 and CSR rules, the CSR reporting in the directors report will not be applicable to a Company which has FY Jan – Dec 2014. The query is, are these companies whose FY have started prior to Apr 2014 required to spend any CSR budget in their FY 2014? Even if they spend, there is no reporting in their directors report for FY 2014. Query 2 is – Suppose a company is required to spend Rs.100 in a particular FY, was able to spend just Rs.60. The requirement is that Company shall give details of Rs.60 spent and the reason for not spending Rs.40 in the CSR report in the directors report. What will happen to Rs.40 that is unspent? Will it goes back to the business of the Company or needs to be spent in succeeding years. Please clarify with relevant provisions.
- Views (1549)
-
- Posted By: Vijayamahantesh khannur 10 year(s) ago
|
|
The companies act states that preferential allotment shall also be treated as private placement and will have to comply with the r
Read More
The companies act states that preferential allotment shall also be treated as private placement and will have to comply with the requirements of private placements like issue of letter of offer, valuation by registered valuer etc. In case of preferential allotment of shares or other convertible securities to the promoters, should the company issue letter of offer and comply with the other requirements like valuation. With regard to the special resolution to be passed, can the company pass a single resolution with an upper limit so that the resolution can be used for all allotments to be made during the next 12 months. I understand that the special resolution should be acted upon within 12 months. Can a price band be fixed with power to the board to determine the price. In case of price band, how would the post issue shareholding pattern be made. Only when the exact price of share is known, can the number of shares to be alloted be determined. Please advice.
- Views (2068)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1558)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1280)
-
- Posted By: Nitin 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1291)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2416)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1851)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1395)
-
- Posted By: Cs anuj solanki 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1448)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1474)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1384)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1398)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1353)
-
- Posted By: Nirupama v 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1641)
-
- Posted By: Lakshminarayana n 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1171)
-
- Posted By: Jainam shah 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1705)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1703)
-
- Posted By: Prerna 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1553)
-
- Posted By: Ujjwal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1803)
-
- Posted By: Alok 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1501)
-
- Posted By: Ravi 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1438)
-
- Posted By: Sapna tomar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1390)
-
- Posted By: Revathy` 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (15080)
-
- Posted By: Ravi 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1478)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1336)
-
- Posted By: K gopalan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1691)
-
- Posted By: Comsec 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1746)
-
- Posted By: Ramesh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1710)
-
- Posted By: Kejal shah 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1908)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
A private company having an authorised capital of Rs. 2 Crores wish to takeover the business of a partnership firm. In that firm b
Read More
A private company having an authorised capital of Rs. 2 Crores wish to takeover the business of a partnership firm. In that firm both the partners hv contributed 75 lacs each as their capital contribution. i.e Rs.1.50 Cr.The company proposes to issue equity shares to both the partners at par i.e issue of 1500000 shares of Rs.10/- each. As the company is not getting hard cash at the time of allotment,this shares will be issued for consideration other than cash. My query is about what option is to be selected for point no 4 (iv) of the form PAS 3, consideration received is (a)- assets and property acquired or (b)- Goodwill or (d)-Conversion of loan or (e) any other and write against capital contributed in firm.Further how this allotment will take place. Are we require to follow the whole private placement procedure.
- Views (1336)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1319)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1320)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2080)
-
- Posted By: P banerjee 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1593)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1484)
-
- Posted By: Dhananjay 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2031)
-
- Posted By: Piyush 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1278)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1101)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1603)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
Rule 14(2) (a) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 provides that A company shall not make a privat
Read More
Rule 14(2) (a) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 provides that A company shall not make a private placement of its securities unless the proposed offer of securities or invitation to subscribe securities has been previously approved by the shareholders of the company, by a Special Resolution, for each of the Offers or Invitations:Provided that in the explanatory statement annexed to the notice for the general meeting the basis or justification for the price (including premium, if any) at which the offer or invitation is being made shall be disclosedProvided further that in case of offer or invitation for non-convertible debentures, it shall be sufficient if the company passes a previous special resolution only once in a year for all the offers or invitation for such debentures during the year.In the Companies Act 2013 YEAR has not been defined. Further section 2 (95) provides that words and expressions used and not defined in this Act but defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 or the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or the Depositories Act, 1996 shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in those Acts.The word YEAR has also not been defined in the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 or the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 or the Depositories Act, 1996.Considering the above, views are sought if the approval of shareholders under the second proviso to Rule 14(2) (a) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 needs to be taken on Financial year (defined in Companies Act 2013) basis or the said approval of shareholders can be taken on AGM to AGM basis or on calendar year basis.:
- Views (1170)
-
- Posted By: Manohar balwani 10 year(s) ago
|
THis is in connection with issue and allotment of shares to a foreign parent co under new Act. FEMA requires shares to be issued a
Read More
THis is in connection with issue and allotment of shares to a foreign parent co under new Act. FEMA requires shares to be issued at fair value certified by auditors. Also, Section 62 of the new Act requires that issue of shares should be at value determined by the registered valuer. In one case, the value of share is around Rs. 1.2 whereas the face value is Rs. 10. Section 53 of the Act prohibits issue of shares at discount. We are confused. If the issue is in accordance with Section 62, i e at Rs. 1.2, there will be a violation of section 53. Is there any conceptual misunderstanding By Hina Sadrani, Self Employed
- Views (1923)
-
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1540)
-
- Posted By: Chirag shah 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1614)
-
- Posted By: Cs ram thakkar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1338)
-
- Posted By: Cs ram thakkar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1341)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1384)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
One company has pass special resolution u/s. 42 read with 62 with relevant rules under provisions of Co. Act, 2013 for offer, issu
Read More
One company has pass special resolution u/s. 42 read with 62 with relevant rules under provisions of Co. Act, 2013 for offer, issue of and allotment of Shares of Rs. 5 Crores to 120 persons in one or more tranches and as per the provisions of act and rules the validity of resolution is 12 months from the date of passing of resolution. The Board of Directors have approved Letter of offer in Form PAS4 and send the same first to 42 persons out of 120 persons ? We want following clarifications : 01. What is validity of Private Placement offer Letter in Form PAS4. ? 30 days or 12 months. 02. The company send offer letter to first 42 persons and made allotment and then we want to send offer letter to another 45 person out of 120 person, should the company need to prepare and approved offer letter in Form PAS -4 again and again until the completion of allotment for the total shares for which special resolution passed ? 03. Whether company need to maintain record in Form PAS 5 again and again when the company send Offer to total 120 persons until completion of allotment of total shares under special resolution passed ?
- Views (1535)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1067)
-
- Posted By: Piyush 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1286)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1561)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
If a company hold an EOGM to approve the offer of shares u/s 42 & 62 and file MGT-14 within 30 days and then call board meeting ne
Read More
If a company hold an EOGM to approve the offer of shares u/s 42 & 62 and file MGT-14 within 30 days and then call board meeting next month and issue offer letter, F-GNL-2 with PAS-4 is to be filed within 30 days of this board meeting but Form GNL-2 asks for the EOGM date only. How should we file PAS-4 issued in the board meeting held after EOGM? I we enter the details of MGT-14 and date of EOGM in point 5 of the form then point 8 automatically filled up with the same date. But in fact the two dates are different. The PAS 4 is issued in the Board meeting after one month of the EOGM and if we file the form with EOGM date it will be late obviously and otherwise also it is not correct. PAS4 is to be filed within 30 days of its issue date.Can anybody help if they hv filed this form? itis urgent.
- Views (1149)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1606)
-
- Posted By: Anshul mittal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1242)
-
- Posted By: Radhika 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1694)
-
- Posted By: Mohan srinivasan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1197)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3218)
-
- Posted By: Vikram 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1312)
-
- Posted By: Vinay b l 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1136)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar singla 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1199)
-
- Posted By: Revathy` 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1266)
-
- Posted By: Sapna tomar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (960)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1268)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1199)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1559)
-
- Posted By: Hardam singh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1478)
-
- Posted By: Rajapanduranga 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (852)
-
- Posted By: Cs rohit 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1879)
-
- Posted By: Shrenik 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2048)
-
- Posted By: Shrenik 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1514)
-
- Posted By: Satish kshirsagar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1418)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1249)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1719)
-
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1031)
-
- Posted By: Gowri 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1549)
-
- Posted By: Ramnik bhimani 9 year(s) ago
|
|
|
- Views (3512)
-
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1227)
-
- Posted By: Monika bhardwaj 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1709)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (800)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2828)
-
- Posted By: Venkatesh babu t r 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (14778)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1038)
-
- Posted By: Vijay shankar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1266)
-
- Posted By: Kamlsh tripathi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1070)
-
- Posted By: Kamal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1961)
-
- Posted By: Vishwaradhya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (936)
-
- Posted By: P k krishnamurthy 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1682)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
A Person wants to Transfer its shares in an unlisted public company, registered office of which is situated at Nagpur and both Tra
Read More
A Person wants to Transfer its shares in an unlisted public company, registered office of which is situated at Nagpur and both Transferor and Transferee blong toPanipat ,a city in Haryana and they will execute the Form SH-4 in Panipat only. Under which act Stamp Duty will be paid Maharashtra or Haryana??. If maharashtra how will they purchase Share Transfer Stamp as they both are based in haryana. and How will Market Price of shares be calculated, as stamp on share transfer is .25 % on Consideration Paid or Market Price of the Shares , whichever is higher?.
- Views (1140)
-
- Posted By: Mahak 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1085)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1474)
-
- Posted By: Revati galgali 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4664)
-
- Posted By: Comsec 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1727)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5741)
-
- Posted By: Rajeesh kumar c 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (784)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (682)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (805)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (761)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (932)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (958)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1010)
-
- Posted By: Bharat 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2266)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1450)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (903)
-
- Posted By: Sandhya 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (857)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (7181)
-
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1194)
-
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1386)
-
- Posted By: Charu khatri 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (791)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1033)
-
- Posted By: Vandana bhatia 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1139)
-
- Posted By: Ravi kiran 9 year(s) ago
|
SHARE TRANSFER - Share Transfer Deed exceuted in 2000 by transferor & Tranferee. The shares was delisted from Stock Exchange for 7
Read More
SHARE TRANSFER - Share Transfer Deed exceuted in 2000 by transferor & Tranferee. The shares was delisted from Stock Exchange for 7-8 years. Now the company again listed with stock exchange. The Transfer deed executed in 2000 is valid OR not now for Transfer of Shares. As per the Companies Act, 2013 Transfer deed is not required to authenticate by ROC. The MCA has clarified regarding transfer of shares and validity of transfer deed vide Circular No. 19/2014 dated 12.06.2014.
Presently, SH 4 is not required to authenticate by ROC. Pls. clarify FORM 7B executed in 2000 will be required re-validate by ROC. OR the company will accept the same FORM 7B for transfer of shares.
- Views (1126)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1200)
-
- Posted By: Kejal shah 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1059)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 9 year(s) ago
|
Please clarify regarding Issue of Shares:
1. A Pvt. Ltd. company dealing in Multi media business
2.The remittance received in
Read More
Please clarify regarding Issue of Shares:
1. A Pvt. Ltd. company dealing in Multi media business
2.The remittance received in US$ in August 2013.
3. The company has given declaration to the bank on receiving of remittance – the remittance is received as investment by NRI on non repatriation basis.
4. The company has accounted above amount as Unsecured Loan in its Books of accounts.
5. Now, the company desire to convert Unsecured Loan into Equity Shares.
6. Please clarify:
Can the company issue Equity shares on conversion of unsecured Loan?
If yes What are the formalities need to comply?
- Views (668)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (957)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (865)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1075)
-
- Posted By: Harpreet 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (649)
-
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1032)
-
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (913)
-
- Posted By: Amruta tendulkar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1537)
-
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (4041)
-
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1206)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1021)
-
- Posted By: Vijay oganiya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1032)
-
- Posted By: Rajeesh kumar c 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1478)
-
- Posted By: P t joseph 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1260)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1504)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (963)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1327)
-
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (673)
-
- Posted By: B.basu 8 year(s) ago
|
In Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting,
Audit, Transfer and Refund) Amendment Rules, 2017, in Rule 6(3)(
Read More
In Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting,
Audit, Transfer and Refund) Amendment Rules, 2017, in Rule 6(3)(d) , in case where shares are held in physical form under (iv) the following is given
' after issue of duplicate share certificates, the company shall inform the depository by way
of corporate action to convert the duplicate share certificates into DEMAT form and transfer
in favour of the Authority.'
Query:
An unlisted company which has not registered with any depository for holding shares in demat form and hence has not given option to share holders to hold shares in demat form and all shares are held in physical form,
In the above case, for complying with IEPF Rules as per Rule 6(3)(d)(iv) in order to transfer unclaimed shares to IEPF, should the company has to compulsorily get themselves registered with a depository and offer its entire shares the option to hold in demat form and then transfer such of those unclaimed shares from physical to demat form to the credit of IEPF authority.
Also as per Rule 7
(4) After verification of the entitlement of the claimant-
(b) to the shares claimed, the Authority shall issue a refund sanction order with the approval of the Competent Authority and shall credit the shares to the DEMAT account of the claimant to the extent of the claimant’s entitlement.
Query:
When the shares of the unlisted company itself is not demat form and company has not offered such facility to shareholders, how the claimant shareholder can hold shares refunded by the Authority in demat account.
Requesting your goodself to please clarify
- Views (380)
-
- Posted By: Mukund govindharajan 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (991)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (752)
-
- Posted By: Vaidyanathan 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1361)
-
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1039)
-
- Posted By: Avijit 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (453)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (786)
-
- Posted By: Rohit 5 year(s) ago
|
- Views (666)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (938)
-
- Posted By: Sayed mahmood alam 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (859)
-
- Posted By: Viral sanghavi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1229)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (955)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (920)
-
- Posted By: Venkatesan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (541)
-
- Posted By: Sonam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (637)
-
- Posted By: Sonam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (942)
-
- Posted By: Sonam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (898)
-
- Posted By: Sonam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1025)
-
- Posted By: Sonam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1073)
-
- Posted By: Sonam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (943)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
Dear Group Members:- Request for provide your views for the below matter :- Roc has filed the case in reference of prosecution un
Read More
Dear Group Members:- Request for provide your views for the below matter :- Roc has filed the case in reference of prosecution under section 162 (1), 220 (3) against the company in April 2008 , The Hon'ble CJM COURT, ALIPORE has been stated in the order on 15.09.2014 as The case is withdrawn u/s 257 of CRPC. Is there any need for company to file INC 28 ( form 21 - 1956), if yes then what is the time limit for the same, and as still company has not filed the same what will be steps for the same. If no then why still in master data the same is showing in Prosecution details, company have already send the hard copy to ROC by registered post. In the light of Decision / order of Hon'ble CJM COURT, ALIPORE as stated above company approached the MCA also and from there company got reply "Please contact ROC on this.We are not authorized to do so." Request to guide the same.
- Views (1011)
-
- Posted By: Nitn mehta 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (924)
-
- Posted By: Aravind 9 year(s) ago
|
In case of companies other thn small companies and all public companies the form AOC-4 and MGT-7 required to be certified by the p
Read More
In case of companies other thn small companies and all public companies the form AOC-4 and MGT-7 required to be certified by the professionals. My query is that when we hv some qualifications on the workings of any company like mostly in case of section 188 all the companies are showing that the related transaction are at arm length and so section 188 does not apply. but if we hv some qualification or on that or on compliance of any other section then how do we register or mark our qualification? By certifying the form we are certifying that the company has complied with all the compliance.
- Views (904)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (675)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1264)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1091)
-
- Posted By: K k arora 9 year(s) ago
|
A private limited company was incorporated in fy 2011-2012 but till date that company has not complied any of the roc compliances.
Read More
A private limited company was incorporated in fy 2011-2012 but till date that company has not complied any of the roc compliances. Now the owner of the company wishes to comply all roc compliances and has agreed to pay additional fee as well for form submission. My questions are
1) For the fys 2011-12, 12-13 and 13-14 Whether all compliances shall be as per the companies act 1956 or 2013? kindly refer section, circular or notification in support of answer.
2) After incorporation auditor was appointed for the FY 2011-2012 but no compliance was made thereafter. What shall be the procedure for appointment of auditor for FY 12-13 & 13-14 other than the retiring auditor?
- Views (878)
-
- Posted By: Subhash bhaskar 9 year(s) ago
|
*Conversion of Loan into capital[Sec 62(3)* Sec 62(3) states if company takes a loan on the term that loan will be converted int
Read More
*Conversion of Loan into capital[Sec 62(3)* Sec 62(3) states if company takes a loan on the term that loan will be converted into share capital & such an option have been approved before raising of loan by a special resolution, subscribed capital can be increased. *Procedure for conversion of loan into shares:* i. Approve terms of loan by passing special resolution before taking of loan & file special resolution in E-Form MGT14 within 30 days. ii. Convert loan into shares by passing resolution in Board Meeting & File Eform PAS3 for allotment of shares within 30 days. iii. Also issue share certificate by passing Board resolution & file Eform MGT 14 within 30 days for issue of shares. My query: Can we convert Loan taken by a company before the commencement of the CA, 2013 to shares and file pas-3 form?
- Views (4199)
-
- Posted By: Kamal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (687)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1086)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (900)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1303)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1776)
-
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (896)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (809)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1089)
-
- Posted By: Ruchi mitra 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1585)
-
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1071)
-
- Posted By: M b s agarwal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1595)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1013)
-
- Posted By: Balachandran 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1282)
-
- Posted By: U l basak & co. 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1170)
-
- Posted By: Ca.kousik ghosh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (653)
-
- Posted By: D singh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1264)
-
- Posted By: M b s agarwal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1770)
-
- Posted By: Revati galgali 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1652)
-
- Posted By: Z khan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (662)
-
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1189)
-
- Posted By: U l basak & co. 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1005)
-
- Posted By: Hitender tanwar 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (5150)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1075)
-
- Posted By: Chnadravijayshah 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2410)
-
- Posted By: Palani kumar b 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1091)
-
- Posted By: Shekhar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1007)
-
- Posted By: Shekhar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (745)
-
- Posted By: U l basak & co. 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (920)
-
- Posted By: Ca.kousik ghosh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (999)
-
- Posted By: Rr 9 year(s) ago
|
|
Company “A” Limited has appointed as an additional director to fulfill the requirement of number of Independent Directors as requi
Read More
Company “A” Limited has appointed as an additional director to fulfill the requirement of number of Independent Directors as required under the Companies Act, 2013 and listing agreement with Stock Exchanges. The appointment of said additional director would be approved as an Independent Director in the next Annual General Meeting of the Company as required under section 150(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. In this connection the following queries are to be considered :- i) What will be the category of additional director for the intervening period i.e. from the date of appointment as an additional director till the next Annual General Meeting whether he will be independent or professional; ii) Whether the Board has power to appoint independent director and accordingly whether we can categorize such additional director as independent director in the Form DIR12 to be filed on appointment of directors; iii) If such additional director is to be treated as an independent director from the date of which he was appointed as an additional director then whether the intervening period from the date of appointment as an additional director till the next general meeting of the Company would be counted for the purpose of two terms of upto five consecutive years each as mentioned in Section 149(10) of the Companies Act, 2013.
- Views (1398)
-
- Posted By: Amish 10 year(s) ago
|
Please refer to the rules related to the appointment of an Independent Director i.e.Rule No. 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Q
Read More
Please refer to the rules related to the appointment of an Independent Director i.e.Rule No. 4 of The Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 the proviso provided that any intermittent vacancy of an ID shall be filled-up not later than immediate BM or 3 months from the date of such vacancy, whichever is later. Now if we got to Schedule IV ("Code for Independent Director") VI. Resignation and removal: Point 2. it has been provided that the ID vacancy shall be filled up within 180 days from the date of removal or such resignation. Please clarify within how many days the vacancy of ID should be filled-up
- Views (1690)
-
- Posted By: Pradeep chugh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2187)
-
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1823)
-
- Posted By: Anjali 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1691)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1620)
-
- Posted By: Ashutosh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1764)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1811)
-
- Posted By: Meenakshi sharma 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1512)
-
- Posted By: Mitesh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1264)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1481)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
Regarding appointment of Independent Director under section 149 (4) of Co. Act 2013 read with Rules 4 of The Companies (Appointme
Read More
Regarding appointment of Independent Director under section 149 (4) of Co. Act 2013 read with Rules 4 of The Companies (Appointment & Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 provides that the following class or classes of companies shall have latest two Directors as independent Directors on the Board of Directors of the Company (iii) a public company which have, in aggregate of, outstanding Loans, debentures and deposits, exceeding fifty crores rupees In this regard please clarify the following : 01. What is meaning of “Outstanding loans” i.e. both short term and long term loans both or Else ? 02. For the purpose of this rules it is stated that, the paid up share capital or turnover or outstanding loans, debentures and deposits, as the case may be as existing on the last date of latest audited financial statements shall be taken into account then : Please clarify which date i. e. date of balance-sheet as on 31st March or date of signing of Balance-sheet of that year ?
- Views (1914)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2027)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1647)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1515)
-
- Posted By: Ajith 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1762)
-
- Posted By: Joy kumar jain 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1873)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1586)
-
- Posted By: Sandeep 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1423)
-
- Posted By: Pritesh gangwal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1461)
-
- Posted By: Ranjal laxmana shenoy 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1693)
-
- Posted By: Ranjal laxmana shenoy 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1437)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (987)
-
- Posted By: Amod kumar jha 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1400)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1336)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1332)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 10 year(s) ago
|
We have incorporated a company with 5 lacs authorised capital in October 2013 with 2 individuals as subscribers to MOA. One indiv
Read More
We have incorporated a company with 5 lacs authorised capital in October 2013 with 2 individuals as subscribers to MOA. One individual is Indian resident subscribed for 1 share and the other is a foreign national [who is staying in india for the past 4years] who subscribed for 499 shares of rs.1000 each. Later, the parent company remitted 483000 towards share applicaation money and were allotted 483 shares. Authorised capital increased to 10 lacs also. 1 share is allotted to indian resident on receipt of money but no shares are allotted to foreign national. The FC GPR is filed with RBI. Now RBI is asking why the company has not allotted shares to foreign national when he agreed to subscribe for 499 shares in MOA? My question is it compulsory for company to allot shares to the subscribers to MOA before alloting to external investors. What section in companies act provides this? Company has closed its financial year ending 31st March 2013 and filed Annual compliances with ROC. Kindly suggest
- Views (1106)
-
- Posted By: Aravind 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (869)
-
- Posted By: Akhand 9 year(s) ago
|
1. Will ‘loan from own shareholders taken by a private limited nbfc’ come under the definition of Public Fund as per RBI Circ
Read More
1. Will ‘loan from own shareholders taken by a private limited nbfc’ come under the definition of Public Fund as per RBI Circular dated 01.09.2016 vide chapter II point 3 (xxv), though deposit/loan from own shareholders is not regarded “Public Deposit” and there is no outside fund, loan belongs to shareholders of company themselves.
2. Will ‘Overdraft against own Bank FDR taken by a private limited nbfc’ come under the definition of Public Fund/Bank finance as per RBI Circular dated 01.09.2016, whereas Bank FDR is not considered even as Financial Assets as per Rbi circular RBI/2011-12/446 DNBS (PD)CC.No.259 /03.02.59/2011-12 dated March 15, 2012 , since this Overdraft is only against NBFC’s own fund deposit as FDR to save interest, and there is no real Bank Finance, means any body can take Overdraft against FDR without going through any process as in other bank Finance, where one has to be understood of having character of three C’s i.e. Capability, Capacity and Character. In another words, If there is no FDR, there will be no overdraft, means no real Bank Finance.
3. Will loan from ‘Holding private limited NBFC’ to its ‘associate private limited NBFC’ and vice versa or ‘loan within group entities to one another’ come under ‘inter corporate deposit’ under Public Fund as per RBI Circular dated 01.09.2016, since in real sense there is no outside Public Fund is involved.
- Views (1690)
-
- Posted By: Pawan mittal 5 year(s) ago
|
- Views (748)
-
- Posted By: Akhand 9 year(s) ago
|
|
This is regarding associate and subsidiary companies. As per new act even the loan given to subsidiary companie by its holding com
Read More
This is regarding associate and subsidiary companies. As per new act even the loan given to subsidiary companie by its holding companies are not exempt except in case of 100% subsidiaries. If a company holds the entire share capital of its subsidiary except one share ehich is held by one of the holding as well as subsidiary company's Director(all the Directors are same in both the companies) will it be treated as 1005 subsidiary or the one share must be held as a nominee by complying with the beneficial interest requirement to make it a 1005 subsidiary
- Views (649)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
As per the proviso to sec 129(3) Subsidiary company included Associates Companies also. Further as per regulation 16 (1) (c ) of S
Read More
As per the proviso to sec 129(3) Subsidiary company included Associates Companies also. Further as per regulation 16 (1) (c ) of SEBI (Listing Obligations And Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 Definition “material subsidiary” which mean a subsidiary, whose income or net worth exceeds twenty percent of the consolidated income or net worth respectively, of the listed entity and its subsidiaries in the immediately preceding accounting year. So Does consolidated income or consolidated net worth mean consolidated income as per Section 129 (3) as per Companies Act 2013 or Consolidation is required for Holding and Subsidiary only Excluding Associates Company for the purpose of interpretation of regulation?
- Views (613)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 8 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1764)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (6094)
-
- Posted By: Brajesh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1869)
-
- Posted By: Kishore chawla 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1322)
-
- Posted By: Nitin 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1805)
-
- Posted By: Pranay patel 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3124)
-
- Posted By: Mihir panchmatya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1492)
-
- Posted By: Ca bhagyashree sathe 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1975)
-
- Posted By: Ananya gupta 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2153)
-
- Posted By: Manoj dhariwal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1734)
-
- Posted By: Nalin jain 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1415)
-
- Posted By: Animesh sharma 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2098)
-
- Posted By: Mohit kumar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1721)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1908)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1900)
-
- Posted By: Megha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (7668)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2006)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1714)
-
- Posted By: Arpitha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1691)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1664)
-
- Posted By: Ankit 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2372)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1663)
-
- Posted By: Bhoomika jain 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1468)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 8 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (687)
-
- Posted By: Gokul rathi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (764)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (3500)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1808)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2381)
-
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2236)
-
- Posted By: Neha seth 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2168)
-
- Posted By: Hitender tanwar 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (5234)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2240)
-
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1518)
-
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1714)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1921)
-
- Posted By: Mayank 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1365)
-
- Posted By: Vijay khera 8 year(s) ago
|
I want to incorporate a company with 3 directors, 2 of them are in Germany, How to get documents attested in this case.
And wha
Read More
I want to incorporate a company with 3 directors, 2 of them are in Germany, How to get documents attested in this case.
And what about INC-9 and INC-10, these are to be printed on stamp paper and requires notary, how to do it practically.
Please note: the two directors who are in Germany are residing there since last 10 months and they have all the documents like PAN, Aadhar, Driving Licence etc.
If someone has done this, please answer, its quite urgent.
- Views (1236)
-
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1285)
-
- Posted By: Nishit 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1245)
-
- Posted By: Secretarial monks 8 year(s) ago
|
A foreign body corporate incorporates a company in India as its wholly owned subsidiary. Incase of non-individual subscribers it
Read More
A foreign body corporate incorporates a company in India as its wholly owned subsidiary. Incase of non-individual subscribers it is mandatory to attach MOA and AOA apostilled in pdf in Inc-32 Spice.
But if the authorised signatory comes down to India for incorporating the company and if he signs in subscriber clause for the body corporate what would be position of "apostillation" can it be locally notarised like other proofs and documents, since no body is available abroad to do all the procedures and he should be present there too to get all done. He is in India with valid business visa. Can anybody help on this. Thanks in advance.
- Views (1109)
-
- Posted By: Akila 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1375)
-
- Posted By: Sumanta kumar dasgupta 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1246)
-
- Posted By: Vijay khera 8 year(s) ago
|
We have initiated the procedure for Incorporation of a company under Chapter XXI for Conversion (i.e. Vesting of Interest) of a Co
Read More
We have initiated the procedure for Incorporation of a company under Chapter XXI for Conversion (i.e. Vesting of Interest) of a Co operative Society into a limited Company. After filling INC-1, MCA clarified that Since the Rules are not clear in this context u/s 366 Part-1 of Chapter XXI of Companies Act,2013.The proposed name is not allowed, till further clarification in this matter.
Further we revived guidance from MCA to convert the Co operative Society into LLP and then Convert the LLP into a Limited Company.
So please guide us in this regard and kindly explain the procedure.
- Views (1590)
-
- Posted By: Kedar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1612)
-
- Posted By: Govind 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2485)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1316)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1768)
-
- Posted By: Akila 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1737)
-
- Posted By: Jitendra 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1889)
-
- Posted By: Suresh k s 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1433)
-
- Posted By: Manoj kumar koyalkar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1463)
-
- Posted By: Vimal chhabra 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1708)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1611)
-
- Posted By: Prakash khedekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1284)
-
- Posted By: Sandhya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1473)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3005)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1656)
-
- Posted By: Vinay b l 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1233)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2869)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1470)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1515)
-
- Posted By: Mitesh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1511)
-
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1425)
-
- Posted By: Sushil kumar goyal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3416)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1514)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1365)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1269)
-
- Posted By: Ashok kumar verma 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1844)
-
- Posted By: Anjali 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1341)
-
- Posted By: Sumit dhawan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1720)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1395)
-
- Posted By: Ankit kishore sinha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1421)
-
- Posted By: Ankit kishore sinha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1345)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1279)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1254)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1371)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1172)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1288)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1240)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1301)
-
- Posted By: Sashank 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1315)
-
- Posted By: Company secretary 9 year(s) ago
|
[CS_yahoogroups) PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW
Actions
C S GROUP 16:45PM Keep this message at the top of your inbo
Read More
[CS_yahoogroups) PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF LAW
Actions
C S GROUP 16:45PM Keep this message at the top of your inbox Groups
To: C S GROUP
Sir/Madam,
Can anybody present the following matter before the "Company Law Committee"
One Co-operative society wants to get it registered as a Limited Company u/s 366 of the Companies Act 2013.
In this connection I went to ROC for discussion in relation to format of approval of majority of members of co-operative society and notice for such registration to be given by Co-operative society in News paper.
But ROC informed me that such registration under Part I of Chapter XXI has been stopped, since there is ambiguity in the Act and the rules notified for the said chapter.
ROC also informed me that there is an internal Order of Higher authorities for not registering such companies till further orders.
I think this is the problem in implementing the law.
You are requested to present before the Company Law Committee.
- Views (1349)
-
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (979)
-
- Posted By: Deepak 8 year(s) ago
|
Dear Experts,
One of my client running a proprietorship firm and possessing of land, building, plant and machinery in the propr
Read More
Dear Experts,
One of my client running a proprietorship firm and possessing of land, building, plant and machinery in the proprietor name and recently he has formed private limited company and having 50% of shares and remaining allotted to his wife and sons. Now my question is they wants to take over the proprietorship concern i.e. all assets and liability of the existing concern into private limited company. Whereas we have not mentioned these transaction in the object clause.
Can anyone provide the procedure to be followed without facing any consequences in future. and they wants to avoid the capital gain tax under income tax act.
Please share the step by step procedures.
- Views (1200)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (942)
-
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1395)
-
- Posted By: Amitesh ravi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (681)
-
- Posted By: Arjun 7 year(s) ago
|
|
|
|
- Views (1101)
-
- Posted By: Nilesh jain 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2960)
-
- Posted By: Pritesh gangwal 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (713)
-
- Posted By: Ashok 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1043)
-
- Posted By: Anil 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (699)
-
- Posted By: Siddhi 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (718)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (820)
-
- Posted By: Nikki 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (830)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (925)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
A listed public company has passed resolution in Sept. 2010 for re-appointment of Managing Director for 5 years i.e (Sept. 2010 to
Read More
A listed public company has passed resolution in Sept. 2010 for re-appointment of Managing Director for 5 years i.e (Sept. 2010 to Sept. 2015) & their remuneration in Remuneration Committee, Board Meeting & Shareholders Meeting under the Companies Act, 1956. The Co. has obtained MCA approval for remuneration payment (5% of Profits) to MD year 2013-14 due to inadequate Profits. The Company has inadequate Profits in current year 2014-15 and required MCA approval. The Co. has not passed any resolution in Remuneration Committee, Board Meeting & Shareholders Meeting under the Companies Act, 2013 during the Year 2014-15. As per MCA Circular 32/2014 dated 23.07.2014 – Clarification on transitional period for resolutions passed under the Companies Act, 1956. It is clarified that resolutions approved or passed by companies under relevant applicable provisions of the old act during the period from 01st Sept, 2013 to 31st March 2014 can be implemented in accordance with provisions of old act, notwithstanding the repeal of the relevant provisions subject to the conditions a) That the implementation of the resolution actually commenced before 01st April, 2014 and b) That this transitional arrangement will be available upto expiry of one year from the passing of the resolution or 6 months from the commencement of the corresponding provision in new Act whichever is later. Now what are the options available to the company: 1. Apply to MCA for their approval on the basis of resolutions passed under the Old Act – The Companies act, 1956. Or 2. The company pass related resolutions in next AGM -2015 and apply to MCA after passing of resolutions for waiver of remuneration payment made to MD during the year 2014-15.
- Views (982)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
Payment of Managerial Remuneration A Unlisted Public Limited Company having no profit or inadequate profit want to appoint/re-ap
Read More
Payment of Managerial Remuneration A Unlisted Public Limited Company having no profit or inadequate profit want to appoint/re-appoint managing Director/WD and proposes to pay or revise remuneration which is less than Slab mentioned in Part (a) of section II of schedule V of companies Act, 2013. For Example (i) Effective capital is Negative or Less than 5 Crores and Limit under this slab is Rs. 30 Laks P.A.- In this case company propose to pay or revise remuneration of Rs. 25 Lacs P.A., So company need to pass ordinary Resolution. Please clearly that in this case is it compulsory for the company to approve the remuneration by Nomination and Remuneration committee ?
- Views (1431)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1133)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (946)
-
- Posted By: Company secretary 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1581)
-
- Posted By: K suresh babu 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1036)
-
- Posted By: Nirupama v 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (963)
-
- Posted By: Astha 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (883)
-
- Posted By: Ashok 7 year(s) ago
|
|
|
- Views (6550)
-
- Posted By: Ravi arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (8818)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1210)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (972)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1495)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1133)
-
- Posted By: Anshul mittal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (994)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (554)
-
- Posted By: M s ramachandran 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1605)
-
- Posted By: Sreenivasa rao 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (617)
-
- Posted By: Khushboo khatreja 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (847)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2469)
-
- Posted By: Rishi harlalka 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1177)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1732)
-
- Posted By: Radhika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1193)
-
- Posted By: Suresh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1392)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1824)
-
- Posted By: R balasubramanian 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (752)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1366)
-
- Posted By: Roshan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1076)
-
- Posted By: Kamal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1405)
-
- Posted By: Viral sanghavi 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (986)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1350)
-
- Posted By: Hardam singh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (999)
-
- Posted By: Debabrata 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (865)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (818)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1702)
-
- Posted By: Sandhya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1019)
-
- Posted By: Jai bhagchandani 9 year(s) ago
|
There are two group companies hving all the three common directors, one is a limited closely held co and the other one is private.
Read More
There are two group companies hving all the three common directors, one is a limited closely held co and the other one is private. Both the companies entered into a demerger scheme and the scheme has been approved by the high court.As per the scheme all the employees of the limited companies will be transferred to the private co. Do the word employees includes the all three whole time directors of the ltd. co. If yes, do we need to change the designation of the WTD to normal Directors in limited co and if yes which form is required to be filed, only DIR-12 for change in designation. When we start paying salary to the Directors from the private co in place of the limited co., do we need to file any form with ROC for that?
- Views (937)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
Our client is a pvt Ltd company having paid up capital of more than 10 crores. They have two corporate shareholders A&B) incorpo
Read More
Our client is a pvt Ltd company having paid up capital of more than 10 crores. They have two corporate shareholders A&B) incorporated outside India ( Japan). A holds more than 95%; B holds less than 1%. The company has got three directors of which two directors ( Non-executive directors in India) are common with A&B. B is subsidiary of A. The company has got transactions with A in respect of sale, purchase and rendering of services. In view of this, could you pl clarify the following a) whether sec 2 (76) (vi) is applicable b) whether Sec 2(76)(viii) is applicable as it talks about company c) whether A ( holding company ) can pass a special resolution in respect of transactions with wholly owned subsidiary d) whether sec 188 is attracted?
- Views (1048)
-
- Posted By: Balachandran 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2952)
-
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1344)
-
- Posted By: Genicon 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1056)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1064)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1025)
-
- Posted By: Tanu 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1313)
-
- Posted By: M b s agarwal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1442)
-
- Posted By: K gopalan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (940)
-
- Posted By: Jitendra kumar 9 year(s) ago
|
A private Company having two Directors(1 MD), MD term expired in March 2015 Co. holds a BM in Jan 2015 for his reappt. for furth
Read More
A private Company having two Directors(1 MD), MD term expired in March 2015 Co. holds a BM in Jan 2015 for his reappt. for further 2 years. Requirements : 1. hold BM, file MGT-14 within 30 days 2. Is is mandatory to file MR-1 for Pvt. Company? 3. Hold GM (its in feb 2015) and file MGT-14 again. 4. Co. having only 2 Directors. (( Can resolution for reappt. of MD in Board meeting ( Jan 2015) can be passed with one interested Director(MD) ))? One more query related to same. Can a single MGT-14 be file for MD reappt.(BM or GM) and Related party transactions?
- Views (984)
-
- Posted By: Pankaj 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1080)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (924)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (694)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1270)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (945)
-
- Posted By: Latha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (857)
-
- Posted By: U m nagaraj 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1030)
-
- Posted By: Laqshya 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (944)
-
- Posted By: Arjun pitti 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2037)
-
- Posted By: Anil 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1778)
-
- Posted By: Ashwani rustagi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (989)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (682)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (680)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (781)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (734)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
Form DIR 12 is to be filed for appointment of any director. The form requires disclosure of interest in other entities. The firs
Read More
Form DIR 12 is to be filed for appointment of any director. The form requires disclosure of interest in other entities. The first field pertains to CIN/LLPIN/FCRN/Registration no. Does it mean that the disclosure is required with respect to companies in which the appointee is director and/or shareholder, LLP in which he is partner, Foriegn company in which he is director and/or member, partnership firm in which he is a partner and HUF/Trust in which he is interested?. Is the disclosure same as required under Sec 184(1)?. If your answer is affirmative, should the director disclose his direct interests once again in the first board meeting which he attends after becoming director in compliance of Sec 184(1)?
- Views (1428)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
As per sec.184, after appointment as Director, The said person is required to disclose his interest in Form MBP-1 in the first me
Read More
As per sec.184, after appointment as Director, The said person is required to disclose his interest in Form MBP-1 in the first meeting he attends as Director. But The Form DIR-12 is required to be filed within 30 day of appointment of Director and one of the Mandatory point of DIR-12 is Interest in other entities.My query is regarding this contradiction only. How a company will fill up this information if the disclosure will be made by the director in the next meeting or only the interest in other entities as Director is required to be fillup here as the same is available in the consent form(DIR-2). If that is the case then the heading should be Directorship in other companies instead of interest in other entities. Can anybody explain?
- Views (1057)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1044)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1142)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (762)
-
- Posted By: Ashok 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (837)
-
- Posted By: Dhavneesh gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (726)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (708)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (713)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1789)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1573)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1697)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1955)
-
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2232)
-
- Posted By: Shiv kumaran 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1093)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (661)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (804)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (777)
-
- Posted By: Raghavan 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1271)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (825)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1468)
-
- Posted By: Rohit kumar 8 year(s) ago
|
18.02.2016
Query regarding appointment of Whole time Director (WTD) - (Section 196)
Company “ABC ltd” at its meeting of the
Read More
18.02.2016
Query regarding appointment of Whole time Director (WTD) - (Section 196)
Company “ABC ltd” at its meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on 9th February, 2016 has appointed Mr. A (age more than 70 years) as a WTD of the Company with effect from 1st April, 2016 for a period of 3 years and Mr. B who is presently the WTD will retire with effect from the said date. As per rule 3 of The Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 company “ABC ltd” is required to file return of appointment of a WTD in form MR-1 within 60 days of such appointment.
Query:
Whether 60 days will be counted from the date of Board meeting i.e., 9th February, 2016 or from the date of Annual General Meeting somewhere in August 2016 when the shareholder will pass special resolution for such an appointment.
- Views (1113)
-
- Posted By: Amish 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (982)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1064)
-
- Posted By: Jaya bhatia 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1470)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2135)
-
- Posted By: Fairanddeal2008 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1033)
-
- Posted By: Anubhav srivastava 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (834)
-
- Posted By: Jyoti 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (817)
-
- Posted By: Smita lohia 6 year(s) ago
|
- Views (571)
-
- Posted By: Renu sharma 5 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1061)
-
- Posted By: Fairanddeal2008 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1080)
-
- Posted By: Pooja hiranandani 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (881)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (666)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (994)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1037)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1004)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (692)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2028)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1124)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (728)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1075)
-
- Posted By: Suparna 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1066)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
There are two group companies hving all the three common directors, one is a limited closely held co and the other one is private.
Read More
There are two group companies hving all the three common directors, one is a limited closely held co and the other one is private. Both the companies entered into a demerger scheme and the scheme has been approved by the high court.As per the scheme all the employees of the limited companies will be transferred to the private co. Do the word employees includes the all three whole time directors of the ltd. co. If yes, do we need to change the designation of the WTD to normal Directors in limited co and if yes which form is required to be filed, only DIR-12 for change in designation. When we start paying salary to the Directors from the private co in place of the limited co., do we need to file any form with ROC for that?
- Views (1140)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1086)
-
- Posted By: Kamal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (803)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay dewan 9 year(s) ago
|
|
|
- Views (1343)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (424)
-
- Posted By: Latha 5 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1493)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (871)
-
- Posted By: K gopalan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (713)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2035)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (969)
-
- Posted By: Ratanshi khatau tanna 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (904)
-
- Posted By: Anil 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1182)
-
- Posted By: Sunny bajaj 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1160)
-
- Posted By: Sunny bajaj 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (934)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2108)
-
- Posted By: Naresh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1306)
-
- Posted By: Kamlesh g pandya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1110)
-
- Posted By: Dharambir singh bisht 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1046)
-
- Posted By: Vinay tripathi 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (871)
-
- Posted By: Hasmukh prajapati 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1107)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 5 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1438)
-
- Posted By: Vithal kumar pingali 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1253)
-
- Posted By: Manjeet singh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (817)
-
- Posted By: Binay 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (416)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 7 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1269)
-
- Posted By: Palani kumar b 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (890)
-
- Posted By: Manoj jangid 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (866)
-
- Posted By: Manoj jangid 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (836)
-
- Posted By: Shraddha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (852)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (908)
-
- Posted By: Nava bharat ventures limited 9 year(s) ago
|
|
|
- Views (1376)
-
- Posted By: Unnikrishnan n 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1454)
-
- Posted By: S ganesan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1285)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1266)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1228)
-
- Posted By: K gopalan 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1493)
-
- Posted By: Swetha 11 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1523)
-
- Posted By: Subhash 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1514)
-
- Posted By: Padmavathi k 9 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1309)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1659)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1582)
-
- Posted By: Varun 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1307)
-
- Posted By: Pranay patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1160)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1226)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (888)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1266)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1182)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1077)
-
- Posted By: T.r.chadha & co. 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (998)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1145)
-
- Posted By: Suman jain 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1032)
-
- Posted By: Latha 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (869)
-
- Posted By: Raja ram bhoopathy 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (793)
-
- Posted By: Anupma khanna 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (725)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (983)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (858)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1002)
-
- Posted By: Suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
Sec 179(3) of CA 2013 states that the board shall excersice borrowing powers only through board meetings. The resolution passed b
Read More
Sec 179(3) of CA 2013 states that the board shall excersice borrowing powers only through board meetings. The resolution passed by the Board has to be filed in MGT 14 within 30 days. Sec 180 states that company cannot borrow other than temporary loans exceeding total of pd up capital and free reserves except with the shareholders approval by way of spl resolution. Should the existing companies having borrowings and the borrowings exceeding total of pd up capital and free reserves as at 31st March 2014 pass the Board resolution and shareholders resolution even if they have not borrowed additionally in the FY 1415 ie after the commencement of provisions of CA 2013?.
- Views (28382)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1994)
-
- Posted By: Akhand 10 year(s) ago
|
As per The Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule 2014 – deposit shall not include – “ any amount received and held pursuant to a
Read More
As per The Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rule 2014 – deposit shall not include – “ any amount received and held pursuant to an offer made in accordance with the provisions of the Act towards subscription to any securities, including share application money…..” It is further clarified that if the amount is not allotted within 60 days of receipt and not refunded within 15 days of completion of 60 days, then the amount shall be treated as deposit. Now, if a company is having share application money as on 31/03/2014, i.e. amount received under earlier Act and not allotted within 60 days of receipt. Also, it could not be refunded with 15 days of completion of 60 days. I have query- whether this amount be treated as deposit or not, as the amount received as share application money under Companies Act 1956 not in the provision of this Act.
- Views (1075)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (986)
-
- Posted By: Neha mittal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1271)
-
- Posted By: Ashish 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1266)
-
- Posted By: Manoher lal goyal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (991)
-
- Posted By: Vishal arora 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1007)
-
- Posted By: Himanshu 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1020)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (998)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (928)
-
- Posted By: Company secretary 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1483)
-
- Posted By: Neeraj 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1316)
-
- Posted By: Latha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1198)
-
- Posted By: Kamlesh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1270)
-
- Posted By: Neeraj 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1148)
-
- Posted By: Deepak kumar falodia 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (994)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1042)
-
- Posted By: Gurpreet kaur 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1061)
-
- Posted By: Devesh k shah 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1492)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh chopra 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (968)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
a. what shall be the status of the aforesaid advances already lying outstanding for more than 365 day as at 31st March, 2014 as th
Read More
a. what shall be the status of the aforesaid advances already lying outstanding for more than 365 day as at 31st March, 2014 as the same were not treated as deposits under the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956? b. The Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules and sections 73 to 76 of the Companies Act, 2013 were made effective from 01.04.2014. Does this mean that only the advances from customers received on or after 01.04.2014 shall be treated as deposits if they cross limit of 365 days, and that the advances received prior to 31.03.2014 shall continue to remain subsisting and are not to be treated as deposits even if they are more than 365 days old? c. Does the Company need to file any form or return to the ROC for the advances from customers lying outstanding for more than 365 days as at 31st March, 2014?
- Views (1231)
-
- Posted By: Anil 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (836)
-
- Posted By: Vikram jeet singh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (980)
-
- Posted By: Suman kadyan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1054)
-
- Posted By: Rajvi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1091)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2604)
-
- Posted By: Comsec 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (9608)
-
- Posted By: Ashok 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (854)
-
- Posted By: Kamlesh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1947)
-
- Posted By: Pr.ramanathan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1163)
-
- Posted By: Sarada 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (868)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1192)
-
- Posted By: R&a associates 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (993)
-
- Posted By: Ca vinod goyal 9 year(s) ago
|
As per sub- section 6 of Section 42 , A company shall allot its securities within sixty days from the date of receipt of the appl
Read More
As per sub- section 6 of Section 42 , A company shall allot its securities within sixty days from the date of receipt of the application money and if the company is not able to allot the securities within that period, it shall repay the application money to the subscribers within fifteen days from the date of completion of sixty days , otherwise it attracts penal provisions. In the given case, if the Company fails to allot shares or refund the amount due and if the Subscribers (Investors) furnishes an undertaking that they shall waive any interest or additional interest and agree to wait till such time the company allots the shares. Is this permissible?
- Views (712)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (879)
-
- Posted By: T.r.chadha & co. 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1086)
-
- Posted By: T.r.chadha & co. 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1025)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (926)
-
- Posted By: Sreenivas babu 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (880)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1082)
-
- Posted By: Dheeraj khandelwal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (606)
-
- Posted By: Alok srivastava 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (503)
-
- Posted By: Anupma khanna 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (826)
-
- Posted By: Suman jain 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (690)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (599)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1087)
-
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (944)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (565)
-
- Posted By: Priti jaiswal 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (774)
-
- Posted By: Priti jaiswal 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1107)
-
- Posted By: T.r.chadha & co. 8 year(s) ago
|
An unlisted public company proposes to issue compulsorily convertible debentures on rights basis. It proposes to pass board resolu
Read More
An unlisted public company proposes to issue compulsorily convertible debentures on rights basis. It proposes to pass board resolution and special resolution at general meeting for the issue as required u/s 71(1). Request the following clarifications: 1.Since debentures are compulsorily convertible, presume will not be covered by sub-sec (3) of sec 62, which deals with increase in subscribed capital arising from exercising option to convert. So would it be in order for the company to follow the process in sub-sec (1) & (2) of Sec 62 for issue of these debentures? 2.Would the company berequired to follow rule 13 of Cos.(Share Capital & Debentures) Rules for determination of the price of shares on conversion of debentures by registered valuer,though not a preferential issue but only a rights issue,which may result in shares allotted to persons other than shareholders through renunciation. 3.Where the offer is to less than 500 members, can the issue be made without appointing a debenture trustee and also without creating security on the company's property? Kindly clarify Request the following clarifications:
- Views (1051)
-
- Posted By: Radha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (648)
-
- Posted By: Sarada 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (881)
-
- Posted By: Sarada 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (955)
-
- Posted By: Sarada 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1116)
-
- Posted By: M b s agarwal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1217)
-
- Posted By: Vikram jeet singh 10 year(s) ago
|
My public limited closely held company wants to do allotment to existing shareholders (Right Issue) in Demat mode. My registered
Read More
My public limited closely held company wants to do allotment to existing shareholders (Right Issue) in Demat mode. My registered office is in Agartala, Tripura and corporate office in Delhi.
My Board meeting for allotment will be held in Delhi and issue of share certificate will also be in delhi.
my queries are
1. Where I need to pay stamp duty on allotment/issue of share certificate ( Delhi or Tripura)
2. What is the applicable rate of duty at both the places
3. Relevant section applicable on transaction.
4. What is the procedure for paying the stamp duty.
5. Authority to be approached.
Pls guide on above.
9871293629
- Views (1011)
-
- Posted By: Neeraj 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1126)
-
- Posted By: R.kandasubramanian 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1003)
-
- Posted By: R&a associates 9 year(s) ago
|
|
|
- Views (1048)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1100)
-
- Posted By: Suresh kothari 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1004)
-
- Posted By: Roshan 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1101)
-
- Posted By: Akila 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1005)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (906)
-
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (632)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (905)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1516)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2187)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1283)
-
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1203)
-
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (987)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (743)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (847)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1533)
-
- Posted By: Ashok 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2251)
-
- Posted By: Ravi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1869)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1379)
-
- Posted By: Rahul srivastava 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1227)
-
- Posted By: Ravinder 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1029)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1360)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (3352)
-
- Posted By: Govind 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1377)
-
- Posted By: Nandini 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2140)
-
- Posted By: Jitesh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1394)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1405)
-
- Posted By: Monali sharma 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1313)
-
- Posted By: Duttalahiri & co 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1168)
-
- Posted By: Kamlesh 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1701)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1739)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
In continuation on my query on appointment of auditors ok we hv to appoint the auditorss for a term of five years starting this yr
Read More
In continuation on my query on appointment of auditors ok we hv to appoint the auditorss for a term of five years starting this yr only in case of non prescribed companies and file ADT-1. But the form ADT-1 is not available for e filing we hv to attach it in GNL-2, Right? Further in ADT-1 there is mention of the period for which appointment is being made and no attachment has been prescribed. Is it not necessary to attach any letter given to auditors or intimation reced from auditors with the form? And if we file ADT-i every year which period we will specify the appointment is for--one financial year or the the remaining 4,3 or 2 financial years?
- Views (1607)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1880)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1790)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
Could you please clarify the following on the appointment of auditors please. We are private limited company having a paid up capi
Read More
Could you please clarify the following on the appointment of auditors please. We are private limited company having a paid up capital of less than 20 crores. The existing auditors have completed 3years. We need to re-appoint in the AGM for next term. The present act requires appointment at the Board +AGM for 5 years. The clarification are as follows: a) Is it mandatory we have to appoint auditors for next 5years. b) If so whether we have to appoint for next two consequent years since they have already completed 3 years or for complete term of next 5 years. c) Will it be in compliance if we appoint for every 1 year as per the erstwhile act of 1956. d) Is it possible to leverage of sec 139(2) wherein three years have given for compliance as it states appointment includes re-appointment? We look forward to your valuable inputs on the above.
- Views (1506)
-
- Posted By: Tci chemicals india pvt ltd 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1929)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 10 year(s) ago
|
In new Form ADT-1, point no.(f) asks for the period of accounts for which appointed. In small companies where rotation is not appl
Read More
In new Form ADT-1, point no.(f) asks for the period of accounts for which appointed. In small companies where rotation is not applicable, we hv appointed auditors for five years.Now my query is -what should be entered in this column 01.04.2014-31.03.2015 or01.04.14 to 31.03.2019. The auditor is going to audit accounts of finacial year 14-15 only with this appointment for coming years ratification is needed as per law, but in resolution we r appointing them for five years.Further in next point g no of finacial year hv been asked for which the appointment is related but i think this column is meant for 139(2) companies only as it asks to fill point no.i before filling this point g.If smbody has filed the form pl. clarify
- Views (2467)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2459)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
This is a case of a company to which Sec 139(2) of CA 2013 is not applicable. The present audit firm of the company is appointed f
Read More
This is a case of a company to which Sec 139(2) of CA 2013 is not applicable. The present audit firm of the company is appointed for stat.audit since inception of the company (18 yrs). So the rotaion of auditors/firm under rule 6 is also not applicable. The tenure of the prev yrs held by the audit firm is 18 yrs though there could be 2 members of the same firm who have signed the auditor accounts over the past yrs. Form ADT 1 permits entry of only 10 yrs under pt no 4(i). Is there necessity to attach optional attachment for remaining 8 yrs?. Is the intent of law is only to seek the details of 10 yrs in case of audit firm as illustrated in rule 6 of the relevant rules?
- Views (1495)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1760)
-
- Posted By: Dhawal kant singh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1348)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
Internal Auditor -As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 such class of companies are required to appoint internal auditor
Read More
Internal Auditor -As per section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 such class of companies are required to appoint internal auditor who shall either be a chartered accountant (CA) or a cost accountant (CMA) or such other professional as may be decided by the board to conduct internal audit. As per rule 13 Explanation the internal auditor may or may not be an employee of the company. Please clarify following – 1) such other professional as may be decided by the board means an employee of the company M.com or LLB qualified may be the internal auditor. 2) An employee of the company CA Inter OR CMA Inter OR CS Inter may be the internal auditor. 3) An employee of the company CA, CMA or CS may be the internal auditor.
- Views (2528)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1521)
-
- Posted By: V. maslekar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1781)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1105)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1330)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1378)
-
- Posted By: Prekshi gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
The appointment of statutory auditors require filing of Form ADT1 within 15 days of the AGM. The act permits appointment of statut
Read More
The appointment of statutory auditors require filing of Form ADT1 within 15 days of the AGM. The act permits appointment of statutory auditor for more than a year with ratification by shareholders at every AGM. Form ADT1 does not have field relating to the period for which the stat.auditor is appointed. However Form GNL2 to which ADT1 is to be attached has to be filled with financial year to which it applies. Should we state just one year that is the 1st yr or the entire tenure say 3 yrs or 5 yrs as the case may be in GNL2?. Should the ratification be followed by filing of ADT1 within 15 days every year for the whole tenure? Though a similar query is recently raised, I would like to have specific reply. Hence the query.
- Views (4885)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1127)
-
- Posted By: Kanika gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1063)
-
- Posted By: Kanika gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1354)
-
- Posted By: Akansha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2095)
-
- Posted By: Piyush 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1147)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1286)
-
- Posted By: Ravi 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1259)
-
- Posted By: Duttalahiri & co 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1776)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1187)
-
- Posted By: Anil 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1311)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1509)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1275)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1242)
-
- Posted By: Prerna 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1259)
-
- Posted By: Mohit kumar 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1384)
-
- Posted By: Kamlesh g pandya 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1981)
-
- Posted By: K. madhusudhan reddy 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1601)
-
- Posted By: Nandini 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1609)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1022)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
Dear Exerts,
XYZ is a Partnership Firm Auditor of a Listed Company for a period more than 15 years, but due to provisions of Rot
Read More
Dear Exerts,
XYZ is a Partnership Firm Auditor of a Listed Company for a period more than 15 years, but due to provisions of Rotation of Auditors XYZ will not be eligible to to reappointed for 5 Years.
Mr. Z a non signing of XYZ Firm resigned and Joined a new CA Firm ABC and ABC appointed as Auditor of That listed Company.
My question is that whether ABC can be appointed as Auditor of that Listed Company whose earlier auditor was XYZ ?
Whether Mr. Z who resigned my XYZ can sign Audit report of that listed company on behalf of New CA Firm ABC?
- Views (950)
-
- Posted By: Nitin 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1365)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (812)
-
- Posted By: Neelam 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (946)
-
- Posted By: Gurpreet kaur 6 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2352)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
in a private limited company, Annual Filing of year 2014 is pending, the company has filed MGT-14 related to Adoption of Accounts
Read More
in a private limited company, Annual Filing of year 2014 is pending, the company has filed MGT-14 related to Adoption of Accounts, Directors report within due date. but the auditor has given his resignation on 31/03/2014 and practically the accounts are not audited on due date. Auditor's resignation is not yet filed to ROC. Now my question is if such casual vacancy of auditor is filled by appointing new auditor by the board which exceed 300 days, will it amounts to any other penalty or compounding other than Additional feed on such board resolution?
- Views (1089)
-
- Posted By: Bunny sehgal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1055)
-
- Posted By: Prerna kapoor 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1321)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1017)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1088)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1116)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1130)
-
- Posted By: Sanjay sharma 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1190)
-
- Posted By: Vivek mittal 9 year(s) ago
|
As for as my understanding to remove auditor company has to call for the board meeting and pass the resolution for removal of the
Read More
As for as my understanding to remove auditor company has to call for the board meeting and pass the resolution for removal of the auditor and file the form with the RD in the ADT 2 after approval of RD hold the general meeting and pass the special resolution and replace the auditor
But my question is under the provision of section 140 says "before taking any action reasonable opportunity should be given to the auditors". when the opportunity should be provided.
i have 2 stages where opportunity should have been given 1. in the board meeting (then what is the notice period). 2. in the GM (then what is use of Going to central govt if the shareholder does not remove such auditor inspire of RD approval).
please give your inputs on the same.
- Views (1000)
-
- Posted By: Naman 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1140)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1123)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1200)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1257)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1200)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1453)
-
- Posted By: Siva naga vijay babu guggilam 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (983)
-
- Posted By: Latha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1274)
-
- Posted By: Kaushik d nahar 10 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (1590)
-
- Posted By: Vivek vijay 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1191)
-
- Posted By: Ashita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2626)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1504)
-
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1312)
-
- Posted By: Aishwarya 6 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1115)
-
- Posted By: Amardeepduggal 6 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1418)
-
- Posted By: Bijal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1654)
-
- Posted By: Neha mittal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1258)
-
- Posted By: Purushottam lal agrawal 8 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (984)
-
- Posted By: Kaushik shah 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (910)
-
- Posted By: Arun rajabhau joshi 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (805)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (718)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (2146)
-
- Posted By: Rajesh agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (944)
-
- Posted By: Arpitha 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (830)
-
- Posted By: Divakaran suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
|
- Views (4569)
-
- Posted By: Jasvir walia 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1462)
-
- Posted By: Nidhi goel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (659)
-
- Posted By: Sunil kumar agrawal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1334)
-
- Posted By: Latha 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (949)
-
- Posted By: Neha mittal 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (876)
-
- Posted By: Haryana 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1614)
-
- Posted By: Atul kulkarni 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (803)
-
- Posted By: Jasleen 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (612)
-
- Posted By: Rkdhandia 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (717)
-
- Posted By: Pravin satardekar 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (819)
-
- Posted By: Rahul 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (991)
-
- Posted By: Pranay patel 7 year(s) ago
|
- Views (870)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (866)
-
- Posted By: Naveen aggarwal 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (840)
-
- Posted By: Gayathri 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1130)
-
- Posted By: Krishna kumar gaggar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (935)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (841)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (867)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (869)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1024)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (877)
-
- Posted By: Dipika 10 year(s) ago
|
|
|
Recently Active Member
RAHUL SELF
About Q&A
Q & A is a unique platform to get your answers. You can create questions by topics or sections for easy identification of your query . You get various alerts to keep you connected and can also search your query.
So keep posting and stay connected
|
|