- Views (1667)
-
- Posted By: Vikas gupta 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1758)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1420)
-
- Posted By: Latha 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1154)
-
- Posted By: Suresh 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1156)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1174)
-
- Posted By: Anita 10 year(s) ago
|
Rules 15(3) (ii) (a) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, specify threshold limit for related party tr
Read More
Rules 15(3) (ii) (a) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, specify threshold limit for related party transactions namely: - Sale, purchase or supply of any good or materials, Selling or otherwise disposing of or buying, property of any kind, Leasing of property of any kind etc. - Limit is 10% of Turnover or Rs. 100 Crores whichever is lower. My questions Is this limit apply for the transactions with individual related party or all related parties together? Suppose the company proposes to entered into related party transactions with Three Parties A,B, C and Individual amount of transactions P.A. with A- is Rs. 2 Crores, B- is Rs. 5 Crores and C- is Rs. 10 Crores. If we consider threshold limit per related party then in this case, only C is cover under the threshold limit prescribed under the rule, then should company require to obtain approval of shareholders for related party transactions with “C” only and for A and B Board approval is suffice ?
- Views (1501)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1190)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (932)
-
- Posted By: Ujwal accounts 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (971)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1060)
-
- Posted By: Chandr sekhar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (873)
-
- Posted By: Manouj agrawaal, fca, partner 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1231)
-
- Posted By: Garima 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (966)
-
- Posted By: Saravanan 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (795)
-
- Posted By: Reena 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (838)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1423)
-
- Posted By: Kishor 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (976)
-
- Posted By: Khushboo 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1217)
-
- Posted By: Ravi 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1503)
-
- Posted By: Rajapanduranga 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1167)
-
- Posted By: Revati sathe 9 year(s) ago
|
with reference to my earlier question Section 188 -- related party transactions are applicable after 01/04/2014, and as per your a
Read More
with reference to my earlier question Section 188 -- related party transactions are applicable after 01/04/2014, and as per your answer resolution should be passed after 01st Sep. 13 to 31st March 2014, but leasing of property of any kind was not included in the Companies act, 1956 and this section 188 implemented from 01/04/2014, now my questions
(1) When any shop owned by one of the Director was shown as Registered Office , but no rent was paid by the Company to the Director and not proper lease agreement was also executed , but NOC for using premises as Registered Office was filed at the time of incorporation-- whether it attracts provision of Section 188. ( if no rent was given by the Company to Director)
(2) what will be situation if rent was given to Director by the Company ( But no proper lease agreement as the company is using premises since incorporation and this transaction was not covered under old act ) --- whether to discontinue giving of rent or to pass resolution ( but under Old Companies act, 1956 or New Companies act, 2014 because only husband and wife are member and Director , no non-interest director was on the Board)
- Views (1090)
-
- Posted By: Revati sathe 9 year(s) ago
|
1) One of our client is a private limited company ; Their shareholders are body incorporated outside India who holds close to 100%
Read More
1) One of our client is a private limited company ; Their shareholders are body incorporated outside India who holds close to 100%. The two directors are common in both and they do not hold any shares either in company incorporated in India and outside India. Could you pl clarify the following: a) whether body corporate who holds close to 100% falls under holding company b) whether related party is applicable u/s188 despite having common directors.
2) Further exemptions have been give under 196(4) (5) ; can we construe that sec 197 is not applicable to private limited company
- Views (1145)
-
- Posted By: Balachandran 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1382)
-
- Posted By: Pooja garg 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (557)
-
- Posted By: Vibha 8 year(s) ago
|
- Views (789)
-
- Posted By: Megha 7 year(s) ago
|
A company has two subsidiaries in one it holds 100% share capital and in other around 70% shares are in the holding company's name
Read More
A company has two subsidiaries in one it holds 100% share capital and in other around 70% shares are in the holding company's name and rest 30 % in the Director's name, which are common in all the three companies.Now for the finalisation of accounts consolidated Financial statements will be made of all the three companies but will the transactions/loans etc held between the holding company and its 2nd subsidiary which is not a 100% subsidiary will attract section 185 and 188 as at the date of balance sheet i.e. 31st march'2015.all the three companies are in the real estate development business and therefore use to do business collectively means to say one has the land the other develops it and the third may done the construction part.
can we treat their work division as done in the ordinary course of business at arm's length or a resolution is required to be passed. The capital of all the three is below 10 crs.
- Views (821)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1430)
-
- Posted By: T.r.chadha & co. 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1490)
-
- Posted By: Vasant patel 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1120)
-
- Posted By: Kamdhenu ispat limited 10 year(s) ago
|
- Views (1167)
-
- Posted By: Anita 9 year(s) ago
|
- Views (828)
-
- Posted By: Arun kumar 10 year(s) ago
|